Newcastle Morning Herald and Miners’ Advocate, Thu 3 Dec 1908 1
NEWCASTLE POLICE COURT.
——–▴—•—▴——–
Wednesday, December 2.
———
(Before Mr W Clarke, SM.)
———
DRUNKENNESS.
One first offender, charged with drunkenness, was fined 5s, in default an hour’s imprisonment.
REMANDED TO SYDNEY.
William Ellis, alias H Rowlands, 37, cook, was charged, on remand, with fraudulently converting to his own use, while the bailee thereof, a horse, sulky, and set of harness, valued at £30, the property of Alfred Johnstone, at Sydney, on November 19. On the application of Plain-clothes Constable Murphy, the accused was remanded to appear at the Central Police Court, Sydney.
A SERIOUS CHARGE.
Ah Chung, a Chinese gardener, was charged with a serious offence. The accused, who was defended by Mr J Windeyer, was committed for trial at the Newcastle Quarter Sessions; bail being allowed, at self in £200, and a surety in a like amount, or two in £100 each.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Newcastle Morning Herald and Miners’ Advocate, Thu 10 Dec 1908 2
QUARTER SESSIONS.
——–—•———–
Wednesday, December 9.
———
(Before His Honor Judge Scholes.)
———
The Newcastle Quarter Sessions were continued yesterday, Mr J Armstrong, KC, acted as Crown prosecutor.
———
ACQUITTALS.
Ah Chung, a Chinese, pleaded not guilty to a serious charge [unnatural offence on Albert Victor Hugo]. The accused, who was defended by Mr R Windeyer, instructed by Mr J Windeyer, was found not guilty, and discharged.
Charles Camm was charged with unlawfully supplying a drug, well knowing the same was intended to procure a certain event, at Newcastle, on September 9. The accused, who pleaded not guilty, was defended by Mr HS Nicholas, instructed by Messrs Braye and Cohen. Sarah Waters, a domestic servant, said she had known the accused all the time she was working at Mrs Perkins’ place, which was three years and eight months, and had been intimate with him. She had a child, which was 20 months old. About July last she discovered she was in a certain condition, and told the accused. He brought her a piece of paper with the names of two kinds of pills written on it, and gave her a shilling to pay for them. The names were not in the handwriting of the accused. He gave her directions as to how she should take the pills, and told her to go to two different chemists for them. She purchased the pills, and took them, and they made her very ill. When the pills were nearly finished, the accused said she would want some more, and he brought her a box of pills. The name of Mr Howland, a chemist, was on the box. She took these pills, which made her sick like the first lot did. On October 9th Dr Crawley saw her, and sent her to the Newcastle Hospital.
To Mr Nicholas: Mrs Perkins kept a boarding house, and Camm was boarding there while witness was working there. Witness had bought pills at Mr Howland’s shop, but they were different from the ones produced. Constable H Roberts said that on October 9th he saw Sarah Waters in a room in Corlette-street, and took her to Mrs Perkins’ boarding-house. There they saw the accused, to whom witness and the young woman spoke. She afterwards became hysterical. Subsequently the accused went with witness to the Newcastle police station.
To Mr Nicholas: On the way to the station accused asked witness to take him to Mr Howland’s chemist shop to see whether he had bought certain pills. Accused all along denied the charge. Accused said, in answer to Inspector G Goulder at the station, that the only pills he had ever bought were another kind. Dr AC Crawley said that on October 9 he saw the young woman at Corlette-street, Newcastle. He ordered her immediate removal to the Newcastle Hospital, where he operated on her. Dr John Harris said he had examined the pills produced, and deposed to their composition. The accused gave evidence that he was a labourer living at Newcastle. He never supplied the young woman with any pills, nor did he give her money to buy any. He did not give her a paper with the names of the pills written thereon. He took two pills of another kind each night. Mrs Elizabeth Perkins said she had been keeping a boarding-house in Corlette-street. The accused boarded there for five years, and she always found him a thorough gentleman. The woman Waters had said that the father of her child born about 20 months ago was a seafaring man. She had told witness that she had also said that Camm was the father, but afterwards said that was not correct. Inspector T Lloyd, of the Newcastle Council, said he had known the accused for 15 years, and found his character exemplary. His Honor in summing up said that the police certainly should have called Mr Howland as a witness for him to say whether Camm bought certain pills at the shop. It was the duty of the police to bring all available evidence, whether for or against an accused person. The pury [sic] returned a verdict of not guilty without leaving the box, and the accused was discharged.
1 Newcastle Morning Herald and Miners’ Advocate, Thu 3 Dec 1908, p. 7. Emphasis added.
2 Newcastle Morning Herald and Miners’ Advocate, Thu 10 Dec 1908, p. 7. Emphasis added.